CASE
LINK
案例资料库我的分析
菜单
多案比较国际依据与资源

面向倡议与法律研究的独立原型 · TrialWatch 历史资料
资料有出处，判断有边界。

返回案例资料库
22/22博主 · 报告 2021-03-24历史案件档案

Dian Abdullah

在马来西亚，因社交媒体发言面临表达或发布受到限制。

独立博主 Dian Abdullah 因批评国王任命新首相以及疫情政策的两篇博文，被分别依据 Penal Code Section 505(b) 与 CMA Section 233(1)(a) 起诉。她在2020年6月缴纳保释金，审判同年12月开始。2021年3月24日的初步报告发表时案件仍在审理；撤诉或无罪只是作者建议。

原文
出处

7 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “Dian Abdullah is the author of the independent Malaysia FlipFlop Blog. On March 21 and 23, 2020, Abdullah published two posts in English criticizing, among other things, Prime Minister Muhyiddin and what she described as the inadequate support provided to those who lost employment as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.[54]”

    正文说明独立博客作者身份、两篇发言日期与批评主题；不自动归类职业记者。

    PDF 第 7 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
  2. 02Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “In June 2020, Abdullah was charged in two instruments with, respectively, “ma[king] statements . . . with intent to cause, or that may cause fear or unrest to the public or to any sections of the public”[2] under Section 505(b) of the Malaysian Penal Code and “consciously ma[king] and commenc[ing] the communication delivery that is abhorrent in nature . . . with intent to offend other people’s feelings”[3] under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA). The Section 505(b) charge stemmed from a blog post made on March 21, 2020 and the Section 233(1) charge stemmed from a blog post made on March 23, 2020. In both posts, Abdullah criticized the King for his role in appointing a new Prime Minister and criticized the new Prime Minister for allegedly mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic and causing extensive suffering.”

    摘要明确2020年6月的两组指控及所引法条；这不是定罪。

    PDF 第 1 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
  3. 03Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “On June 9, Abdullah appeared before Kuala Lumpur Criminal Sessions Court and posted 4,000 ringgit (about 1,000 USD) in bail.[59] The trial commenced on December 22.”

    记载缴纳4,000林吉特保释金与开始审判；未记载免除指控。

    PDF 第 10 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
  4. 04Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “At the end of the witness’s testimony, the judge adjourned the trial to February 24.[65] The February 24 hearing was subsequently postponed to March 25.”

    报告截止时庭审继续延期；3月25日是当时预定的未来庭审，不作已发生事件。

    PDF 第 11 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
  5. 05Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “The American Bar Association Center for Human Rights has been monitoring the proceedings against Abdullah as part of the Clooney Foundation for Justice’s TrialWatch initiative.”

    报告记载 ABA 人权中心作为 TrialWatch 项目观察程序；未证明观察改变结果。

    PDF 第 1 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
  6. 06Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “As described above, the Kuala Lumpur Criminal Sessions Court should acquit or dismiss the case against Dian Abdullah, or the prosecution should withdraw the charges.”

    作者建议无罪、撤案或检方撤回指控；所有措辞均为未实现的建议，不是历史结果。

    PDF 第 16 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
  7. 07Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “Going forward, prosecutors and judges should carefully review proposed charges under Section 505 and Section 233 to ensure that that the criminal conduct at issue is sufficiently grave to warrant a criminal prosecution and that there is a demonstrated and articulated link between the speech and the threat, in line with international standards on freedom of expression.”

    作者呼吁检方与法官审查言论和具体威胁关联，是制度建议。

    PDF 第 17 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
时间线事件
2
行动记录
2
已知结果
2
原文证据
7
截至2021年3月24日初步报告，已缴纳保释金，审判尚未结束，下一次庭审当时定于3月25日；后续结果未知。

原报告事实截至：2021-03-24 · 报告后公开材料在下方另行追加，不改写原报告。

追加的公开追踪记录

保留原报告事实截至 2021-03-24 · 资料整理日期 2026-10-09

上传独立研究报告记载；未经团队人工核实。Personal-case event: sentencing on 21 December 2021, following a guilty plea on 6 December. Fine payment, default imprisonment and later appeal were not verified. Section 233 developments through 6 February 2026 concern separate constitutional litigation and do not establish reversal of Dian's conviction.

本组包含上传研究报告记载的混合事件，不能合计为已实施行动或成功策略。资料导入/检索截至不等于每案状态确认日；研究作者的 verified 不是团队人工核实。

本轮追踪有局部缺口；公开材料更新不等于最新司法状态已确认。

2020-03-21 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 风险或人物情况 · 执行状态未知上传研究报告记载：First post later charged under Penal Code Section 505(b).

本案 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Dian Abdullah — original monitored proceeding · Dian Abdullah

实际参与者：

来源记载的后续结果：仅作研究记录；此行未独立证明后续救济、执行或成功。

行动与结果的关系未知。

  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
Malaysia v. Dian Abdullah — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-20-row-01

First post later charged under Penal Code Section 505(b).
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Original user-supplied report on Malaysia v. Dian Abdullah

TrialWatch / original report authors · 发布 2021-03-24 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Historical case baseline and original assessment

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
CSOs Stand in Solidarity with Individuals being Silenced or Censored for Dissent

Centre for Independent Journalism and co-signatory organizations · 发布 2020-06-19 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Lai Yuet Ming @ Dian Abdullah identity; same post dates, charges and bail. Document date, not misleading filename, used.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2020-03-23 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 风险或人物情况 · 执行状态未知上传研究报告记载：Second post later charged under Section 233(1)(a).

本案 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Dian Abdullah — original monitored proceeding · Dian Abdullah

实际参与者：

来源记载的后续结果：仅作研究记录；此行未独立证明后续救济、执行或成功。

行动与结果的关系未知。

  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
Malaysia v. Dian Abdullah — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-20-row-02

Second post later charged under Section 233(1)(a).
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Original user-supplied report on Malaysia v. Dian Abdullah

TrialWatch / original report authors · 发布 2021-03-24 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Historical case baseline and original assessment

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
CSOs Stand in Solidarity with Individuals being Silenced or Censored for Dissent

Centre for Independent Journalism and co-signatory organizations · 发布 2020-06-19 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Lai Yuet Ming @ Dian Abdullah identity; same post dates, charges and bail. Document date, not misleading filename, used.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2020-06-09 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 法院或机制决定 · 已实施（不是成功标签）上传研究报告记载：Charges brought; CIJ identifies Lai Yuet Ming as Dian Abdullah.

本案 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Dian Abdullah — original monitored proceeding · Dian Abdullah

实际参与者：

来源记载的后续结果：仅作研究记录；此行未独立证明后续救济、执行或成功。

行动与结果的关系未知。

  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
Malaysia v. Dian Abdullah — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-20-row-03

Charges brought; CIJ identifies Lai Yuet Ming as Dian Abdullah.
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Original user-supplied report on Malaysia v. Dian Abdullah

TrialWatch / original report authors · 发布 2021-03-24 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Historical case baseline and original assessment

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
CSOs Stand in Solidarity with Individuals being Silenced or Censored for Dissent

Centre for Independent Journalism and co-signatory organizations · 发布 2020-06-19 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Lai Yuet Ming @ Dian Abdullah identity; same post dates, charges and bail. Document date, not misleading filename, used.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2021-12-06 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 历史行动 · 已提交（不等于受理或成功）上传研究报告记载：Changed pleas to guilty, according to subsequent Bernama sentencing coverage.

本案 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Dian Abdullah — original monitored proceeding · Dian Abdullah

实际参与者：

来源记载的后续结果：仅作研究记录；此行未独立证明后续救济、执行或成功。

行动与结果的关系未知。

  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
Malaysia v. Dian Abdullah — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-20-row-04

Changed pleas to guilty, according to subsequent Bernama sentencing coverage.
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Single mother fined RM10,000 for insulting Agong, former PM

Bernama / Astro Awani · 发布 2021-12-21 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：6 December guilty pleas; 21 December fines and default terms; no fine-payment confirmation.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2021-12-21 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 法院或机制决定 · 已实施（不是成功标签）上传研究报告记载：Sentenced to fines totaling RM 10,000, with imprisonment in default of payment.

本案 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Dian Abdullah — original monitored proceeding · Dian Abdullah

实际参与者：

来源记载的后续结果：仅作研究记录；此行未独立证明后续救济、执行或成功。

行动与结果的关系未知。

  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
Malaysia v. Dian Abdullah — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-20-row-05

Sentenced to fines totaling RM 10,000, with imprisonment in default of payment.
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Single mother fined RM10,000 for insulting Agong, former PM

Bernama / Astro Awani · 发布 2021-12-21 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：6 December guilty pleas; 21 December fines and default terms; no fine-payment confirmation.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2025-02-11 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 法院或机制决定 · 已实施（不是成功标签）上传研究报告记载：Separate statutory development: amended Section 233 uses 'grossly offensive'.

共享法律背景 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Dian Abdullah — original monitored proceeding ·

实际参与者：

来源记载的后续结果：仅作研究记录；此行未独立证明后续救济、执行或成功。

行动与结果的关系未知。

  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
Malaysia v. Dian Abdullah — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-20-row-06

Separate statutory development: amended Section 233 uses 'grossly offensive'.
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
The Government of Malaysia v. Heidy Quah Gaik Li [2026] 3 MLRA 350

Federal Court of Malaysia, reproduced by eLaw · 发布 2026-02-06 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Partial allowance of appeal; restored terms; Quah's protected post; 2025 amendment commencement and appellate decision history.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2025-08-19 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 法院或机制决定 · 已实施（不是成功标签）上传研究报告记载：Separate Quah litigation: Court of Appeal invalidates two pre-amendment terms, as dated in the later Federal Court judgment; appellate report heading instead bears 26 August.

共享法律背景 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Quah constitutional litigation: general Section 233 context ·

实际参与者：

来源记载的后续结果：仅作研究记录；此行未独立证明后续救济、执行或成功。Quah是他人另案，只作一般法律背景；不得自动撤销Dian定罪。

行动与结果的关系未知。

  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
  • Quah是他人另案，只作一般法律背景；不得自动撤销Dian定罪。
Malaysia v. Dian Abdullah — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-20-row-07

Separate Quah litigation: Court of Appeal invalidates two pre-amendment terms, as dated in the later Federal Court judgment; appellate report heading instead bears 26 August.
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Heidy Quah Gaik Li v. Kerajaan Malaysia [2025] 6 MLRA 439

Court of Appeal of Malaysia, reproduced by eLaw · 发布 2025-08-26 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Prospective invalidation of pre-amendment 'offensive' and 'annoy'; heading dated 26 August, unlike subsequent Federal Court account.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
The Government of Malaysia v. Heidy Quah Gaik Li [2026] 3 MLRA 350

Federal Court of Malaysia, reproduced by eLaw · 发布 2026-02-06 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Partial allowance of appeal; restored terms; Quah's protected post; 2025 amendment commencement and appellate decision history.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2026-02-06 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 法院或机制决定 · 已实施（不是成功标签）上传研究报告记载：Federal Court partly allows government's Quah appeal and restores the impugned terms.

共享法律背景 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Quah Federal Court constitutional litigation ·

实际参与者：

来源记载的后续结果：仅作研究记录；此行未独立证明后续救济、执行或成功。他人另案，非Dian上诉；2025/2026法律变化不得倒推个人状态。

行动与结果的关系未知。

  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
  • 他人另案，非Dian上诉；2025/2026法律变化不得倒推个人状态。
Malaysia v. Dian Abdullah — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-20-row-08

Federal Court partly allows government's Quah appeal and restores the impugned terms.
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
The Government of Malaysia v. Heidy Quah Gaik Li [2026] 3 MLRA 350

Federal Court of Malaysia, reproduced by eLaw · 发布 2026-02-06 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Partial allowance of appeal; restored terms; Quah's protected post; 2025 amendment commencement and appellate decision history.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
追踪缺口与检索范围
  • 研究截止并非当前司法状态确认日；PDF和JSON是同一研究成果。
  • Signed plea and sentencing records for both counts, including reasons for the plea change.
  • Fine-payment receipt and any default-imprisonment order or custody record.
  • Any appeal, revision, pardon or application invoking subsequent Section 233 litigation.
  • Reconciliation of the Quah appellate judgment heading's 26 August date with the Federal Court's 19 August account.

本轮逐份读取上传PDF与manifest；未把研究作者的检索/verified作为团队核查。

01 / 事件脉络

案件时间线

2020-06已起诉、传唤或候审

Dian Abdullah 因两篇博文面临两组不同法条指控。

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “In June 2020, Abdullah was charged in two instruments with, respectively, “ma[king] statements . . . with intent to cause, or that may cause fear or unrest to the public or to any sections of the public”[2] under Section 505(b) of the Malaysian Penal Code and “consciously ma[king] and commenc[ing] the communication delivery that is abhorrent in nature . . . with intent to offend other people’s feelings”[3] under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA). The Section 505(b) charge stemmed from a blog post made on March 21, 2020 and the Section 233(1) charge stemmed from a blog post made on March 23, 2020. In both posts, Abdullah criticized the King for his role in appointing a new Prime Minister and criticized the new Prime Minister for allegedly mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic and causing extensive suffering.”

    摘要明确2020年6月的两组指控及所引法条；这不是定罪。

    PDF 第 1 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
2020-12-22审判中

Dian Abdullah 的审判开始。

原文
出处

2 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “In June 2020, Abdullah was charged in two instruments with, respectively, “ma[king] statements . . . with intent to cause, or that may cause fear or unrest to the public or to any sections of the public”[2] under Section 505(b) of the Malaysian Penal Code and “consciously ma[king] and commenc[ing] the communication delivery that is abhorrent in nature . . . with intent to offend other people’s feelings”[3] under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA). The Section 505(b) charge stemmed from a blog post made on March 21, 2020 and the Section 233(1) charge stemmed from a blog post made on March 23, 2020. In both posts, Abdullah criticized the King for his role in appointing a new Prime Minister and criticized the new Prime Minister for allegedly mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic and causing extensive suffering.”

    摘要明确2020年6月的两组指控及所引法条；这不是定罪。

    PDF 第 1 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
  2. 02Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “On June 9, Abdullah appeared before Kuala Lumpur Criminal Sessions Court and posted 4,000 ringgit (about 1,000 USD) in bail.[59] The trial commenced on December 22.”

    记载缴纳4,000林吉特保释金与开始审判；未记载免除指控。

    PDF 第 10 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
02 / 行动记录

谁做了什么，后来发生了什么

01
已实施历史行动程序内法律行动

到庭并缴纳4,000林吉特保释金。

Dian Abdullah已起诉、传唤或候审2020-06-09
材料记载的后续结果

Dian Abdullah 于2020年6月9日在吉隆坡刑事 Sessions Court 缴纳4,000林吉特保释金；此后仍受审。

报告明确联系该行动与所列回应；不外推为最终效果。

原文
出处

2 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “In June 2020, Abdullah was charged in two instruments with, respectively, “ma[king] statements . . . with intent to cause, or that may cause fear or unrest to the public or to any sections of the public”[2] under Section 505(b) of the Malaysian Penal Code and “consciously ma[king] and commenc[ing] the communication delivery that is abhorrent in nature . . . with intent to offend other people’s feelings”[3] under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA). The Section 505(b) charge stemmed from a blog post made on March 21, 2020 and the Section 233(1) charge stemmed from a blog post made on March 23, 2020. In both posts, Abdullah criticized the King for his role in appointing a new Prime Minister and criticized the new Prime Minister for allegedly mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic and causing extensive suffering.”

    摘要明确2020年6月的两组指控及所引法条；这不是定罪。

    PDF 第 1 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
  2. 02Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “On June 9, Abdullah appeared before Kuala Lumpur Criminal Sessions Court and posted 4,000 ringgit (about 1,000 USD) in bail.[59] The trial commenced on December 22.”

    记载缴纳4,000林吉特保释金与开始审判；未记载免除指控。

    PDF 第 10 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
02
已实施历史行动监测与报告

观察刑事程序并在案件结束前发布初步报告。

美国律师协会人权中心 / TrialWatch审判中日期未单列
材料记载的后续结果

材料未记录可与这项行动直接对应的结果。

行动与后续结果的联系未知。

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “The American Bar Association Center for Human Rights has been monitoring the proceedings against Abdullah as part of the Clooney Foundation for Justice’s TrialWatch initiative.”

    报告记载 ABA 人权中心作为 TrialWatch 项目观察程序；未证明观察改变结果。

    PDF 第 1 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
03 / 结果边界

已知结果与信息缺口

部分变化

Dian Abdullah 于2020年6月9日在吉隆坡刑事 Sessions Court 缴纳4,000林吉特保释金；此后仍受审。

事实截至 2021-03-24

原文
出处

2 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “In June 2020, Abdullah was charged in two instruments with, respectively, “ma[king] statements . . . with intent to cause, or that may cause fear or unrest to the public or to any sections of the public”[2] under Section 505(b) of the Malaysian Penal Code and “consciously ma[king] and commenc[ing] the communication delivery that is abhorrent in nature . . . with intent to offend other people’s feelings”[3] under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA). The Section 505(b) charge stemmed from a blog post made on March 21, 2020 and the Section 233(1) charge stemmed from a blog post made on March 23, 2020. In both posts, Abdullah criticized the King for his role in appointing a new Prime Minister and criticized the new Prime Minister for allegedly mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic and causing extensive suffering.”

    摘要明确2020年6月的两组指控及所引法条；这不是定罪。

    PDF 第 1 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
  2. 02Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “On June 9, Abdullah appeared before Kuala Lumpur Criminal Sessions Court and posted 4,000 ringgit (about 1,000 USD) in bail.[59] The trial commenced on December 22.”

    记载缴纳4,000林吉特保释金与开始审判；未记载免除指控。

    PDF 第 10 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
程序未决

Dian Abdullah 的案件在2021年3月24日初步报告发表时仍在审理，下一次庭审当时安排在3月25日；未记录最终裁判。

事实截至 2021-03-24

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “At the end of the witness’s testimony, the judge adjourned the trial to February 24.[65] The February 24 hearing was subsequently postponed to March 25.”

    报告截止时庭审继续延期；3月25日是当时预定的未来庭审，不作已发生事件。

    PDF 第 11 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页

材料未提供

  • 本地 PDF 是2026年10月8日打印的官方网页副本，报告日期为2021年3月24日；PDF页码只对本地副本有效，无稳定印刷页码。
  • 初步报告未提供最终结果；保释与作者呼吁撤诉均不得改写为案件已撤销或已无罪。
  • 证据核验仅指与所供报告对照；不等于独立核实基础事件，也不表示报告日期后的当前状态。
04 / 尚未等同于行动

报告作者建议

以下是报告提出的主张，不能据此认定已实施或已产生结果。

材料仅建议

作出无罪判决或撤案，或由检方撤回指控。

建议涉及：吉隆坡刑事 Sessions Court 或检方（作者建议对象）

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “As described above, the Kuala Lumpur Criminal Sessions Court should acquit or dismiss the case against Dian Abdullah, or the prosecution should withdraw the charges.”

    作者建议无罪、撤案或检方撤回指控；所有措辞均为未实现的建议，不是历史结果。

    PDF 第 16 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页
材料仅建议

审查拟起诉行为是否达到刑事追诉所需严重性，以及言论与所称威胁是否存在明确关联。

建议涉及：检察官与法官（作者建议对象）

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Dian Abdullah已记录原文摘录
    “Going forward, prosecutors and judges should carefully review proposed charges under Section 505 and Section 233 to ensure that that the criminal conduct at issue is sufficiently grave to warrant a criminal prosecution and that there is a demonstrated and articulated link between the speech and the threat, in line with international standards on freedom of expression.”

    作者呼吁检方与法官审查言论和具体威胁关联，是制度建议。

    PDF 第 17 页原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03-24 · 核查 2026-10-08American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch

    页码对应存档的网页打印件；官方网页不支持 PDF 页码跳转。

    打开官方原文网页