CASE
LINK
案例资料库我的分析
菜单
多案比较国际依据与资源

面向倡议与法律研究的独立原型 · TrialWatch 历史资料
资料有出处，判断有边界。

返回案例资料库
20/22活动人士 · 博主 · 报告 2021-03历史案件档案

Alnur Ilyashev

在哈萨克斯坦，因社交媒体发言面临被拘押、联系律师困难、表达或发布受到限制。

人权活动者兼博主 Alnur Ilyashev 因三则批评执政党的 Facebook 帖文被控在紧急状态下传播虚假信息。远程审判伴随连线及保密律师沟通问题。释放请求被拒，一审判处限制行动及活动禁令；上诉未获成功，辩方继而请求总检察长提出抗诉，报告未记载该请求结果。

原文
出处

9 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “From June 12 to June 22, 2020, the American Bar Association Center for Human Rights monitored the trial of Alnur Ilyashev in Kazakhstan as part of the Clooney Foundation for Justice’s TrialWatch initiative. Ilyashev is a human rights activist and blogger. He was prosecuted under Article 274 of Kazakhstan’s Criminal Code for “disseminat[ing] knowingly false information” in a state of emergency on the basis of three Facebook posts that criticized the ruling Nur Otan party for corruption and incompetence, including in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The proceedings – held over videoconference because of COVID-19 – were marred by grave violations of Ilyashev’s right to a fair trial.”

    报告明确活动者和博主身份、三则帖文与远程审判；严重违反公正审判的说法属于报告评价。

    PDF 第 4 页 · 印刷页 3原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
  2. 02Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “At closing, the prosecution requested that Ilyashev be sentenced to three years in prison and be banned from political and civic activism for five years.53 On June 22, Judge Makharadze sentenced Ilyashev to three years of restricted movement, including regular check-ins with a probation officer, and a five-year ban on political and civic activism.54 Ilyashev appealed his conviction.”

    区分检方要求监禁与实际限制行动判决，并记录提出上诉。

    PDF 第 12 页 · 印刷页 11原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
  3. 03Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “Although the Almaty City Court – the appellate court – allowed the presentation of further evidence, on September 15 it upheld the lower court’s decision in full.55 The Kazakh Supreme Court recently denied Ilyashev’s appeal, finding that the court of first instance had sufficiently examined all relevant evidence. The defense has petitioned Kazakhstan’s Attorney General to “file a protest” with the Supreme Court requesting reconsideration of this decision.”

    上诉法院维持原判、最高法院未准上诉与请求总检察长抗诉是三个不同步骤；最后一项结果未载明。

    PDF 第 12 页 · 印刷页 11原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
  4. 04Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “Consistent with the UN Human Rights Committee’s finding that courts must undertake periodic re-evaluation of whether detention remains necessary,72 Ilyashev made several requests for release prior to trial. All were denied by the Medeu court.”

    正文明确审前多次释放请求均被拒；并非成功保释案例。

    PDF 第 16 页 · 印刷页 15原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
  5. 05Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “At the June 18 hearing, the defense noted that the two-month detention period initially approved by the court had expired, arguing that Ilyashev should be released and offering to post bail.78 In denying the request, the court stated that the maximum possible time for pretrial detention was six months, and thus Ilyashev could remain in pretrial detention for that entire period.79”

    辩方在庭审中以最初拘押期已满要求释放并提出保释，法院拒绝。

    PDF 第 17 页 · 印刷页 16原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
  6. 06Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “With respect to the confidentiality of the communications, Ilyashev was restricted to discussing the case with his lawyers over the open video feed during court breaks, sometimes with the prosecution present.121 Throughout the trial, the sole allowance made for private consultations occurred at the hearing on June 19: when the court recessed, other participants were removed from the video feed to permit Ilyashev to consult with his defense team.122”

    报告记录庭间通常无法保密沟通，6月19日曾允许一次私人咨询；该部分改善不等于整个沟通问题解决。

    PDF 第 23 页 · 印刷页 22原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
  7. 07Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “First, the Kazakh Supreme Court should use its power of judicial review and remedy the violations of Ilyashev’s right to a fair trial and right to freedom of expression detailed above. Specifically, the Court should overturn the appellate decision upholding Ilyashev’s conviction.”

    专家呼吁最高法院纠正权利违反并推翻维持原判的上诉裁定；未把建议当已撤销定罪。

    PDF 第 44 页 · 印刷页 43原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
  8. 08Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “Third, video conferencing guidelines recently issued by the European Criminal Bar Association are instructive:226 among other things, the use of videoconferencing should require the consent of the accused; legal remedies should be readily available to challenge a decision on using videoconferencing; an accused’s right to speak confidentially with his or her defense team must be guaranteed at all times (before and during hearings); an uninterrupted and high-quality connection must be in place; accused persons must be provided a full view of the courtroom, and be able to observe all participants; and any technical arrangements should ensure that the virtual hearing resembles an in-person hearing to the greatest extent possible.”

    作者提出远程审判的保密沟通和连线等保障建议；不表示这些保障在本案全部落实。

    PDF 第 44 页 · 印刷页 43原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
  9. 09Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “In particular, the trial demonstrated the potential perils of virtual hearings. Due to technical issues, the feed was constantly interrupted, with the result that the defense was prevented from making motions, presenting arguments, and questioning witnesses.”

    报告记录远程连线持续中断，妨碍辩方提出动议、论证和询问证人；不把远程形式本身当违反标准。

    PDF 第 4 页 · 印刷页 3原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
时间线事件
1
行动记录
4
已知结果
5
原文证据
9
截至2021年3月报告：定罪获维持，最高法院未准其上诉；辩方请求总检察长提出抗诉，结果未记录。

原报告事实截至：2021-03 · 报告后公开材料在下方另行追加，不改写原报告。

追加的公开追踪记录

保留原报告事实截至 2021-03 · 资料整理日期 2026-10-09

从原报告追加WGAD 2022年意见、未证实落实的补救建议、CFJ与Freedom Now联合催办、2023年联合国年报所载政府异议，以及2025年另一人权事务委员会来文待登记记录。肯定性国际意见未被写成国内撤销或赔偿成功。

本组包含上传研究报告记载的混合事件，不能合计为已实施行动或成功策略。资料导入/检索截至不等于每案状态确认日；研究作者的 verified 不是团队人工核实。

以下新增记录按事件日期排列；公开声明、提交与机构受理分别判断。未标为司法裁判的资料不证明新裁判。

2020-06-22 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 法院或机制决定 · 已实施（不是成功标签）上传研究报告记载：Convicted; three-year restriction-of-liberty sentence and five-year civic/public-activity ban imposed.

本案 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Alnur Ilyashev — original monitored proceeding · Alnur Ilyashev

实际参与者：

来源记载的后续结果：仅作研究记录；此行未独立证明后续救济、执行或成功。

行动与结果的关系未知。

  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
Kazakhstan v. Alnur Ilyashev — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-02-row-01

Convicted; three-year restriction-of-liberty sentence and five-year civic/public-activity ban imposed.
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Original user-supplied report on Kazakhstan v. Alnur Ilyashev

TrialWatch / original report authors · 发布 2021-03 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Historical case baseline and original assessment

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2020-09-15 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 法院或机制决定 · 已实施（不是成功标签）上传研究报告记载：Almaty City Court upheld conviction.

本案 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Alnur Ilyashev — original monitored proceeding · Alnur Ilyashev

实际参与者：

来源记载的后续结果：仅作研究记录；此行未独立证明后续救济、执行或成功。

行动与结果的关系未知。

  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
Kazakhstan v. Alnur Ilyashev — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-02-row-02

Almaty City Court upheld conviction.
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Original user-supplied report on Kazakhstan v. Alnur Ilyashev

TrialWatch / original report authors · 发布 2021-03 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Historical case baseline and original assessment

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2021-02-12 · 历史行动 · 已提交（不等于受理或成功）CFJ正文确认Freedom Now与McKool Smith于2021-02-12代表Alnur向WGAD提交申请。

本案 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Alnur 2020 Article 274 criminal prosecution — WGAD petition · Alnur Ilyashev

实际参与者：Freedom Now / McKool Smith

来源记载的后续结果：同来源记载2022-03随后有WGAD意见；没有证明国内撤罪或赔偿执行。

仅保留行动与结果的时间先后，不认定因果。

  • 原始申请全文及案内授权未取得；不由这例推断新案可受理。
Kazakhstan Should Comply with UN Decision and Quash Activist’s Conviction

Clooney Foundation for Justice · 发布 2022-09-13 · Opening paragraph on joint letter issued 2022-09-13; Background opening paragraph on petition actually filed 2021-02-12

issued a letter […] filed a petition with the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
source_checked · full_text · agent_checked · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2022-03-30 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 法院或机制决定 · 已实施（不是成功标签）通过意见，认定其剥夺自由属任意拘留第I、II、III、V类，并将案件转交相关特别报告员。

本案 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：WGAD Opinion No.2/2022；针对2020年Article 274追诉拘押 · Alnur Ilyashev

实际参与者：UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention

来源记载的后续结果：意见于2022-05-13正式发布；认定及转交已经发生，不等于国内判决自动撤销。

仅保留行动与结果的时间先后，不认定因果。

  • 特别报告员后续实际处理本次未找到。
  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
Opinion No. 2/2022 concerning Alnur Ilyashev (Kazakhstan), A/HRC/WGAD/2022/2

UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention · 发布 2022-05-13 · PDF第1页第2段；第16页第100–108段；第17页通过日期2022-03-30。官方PDF经普通curl下载及pypdf读取；web入口报错。

quash Mr. Ilyashev’s sentence, expunge his criminal record
legacy_recorded · full_text · agent_checked · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Kazakhstan v. Alnur Ilyashev — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-02-row-03

WGAD adopted Opinion No. 2/2022 finding arbitrary detention and calling for remedies.
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Opinion No. 2/2022 concerning Alnur Ilyashev (Kazakhstan), A/HRC/WGAD/2022/2

UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; advance unedited text hosted by Freedom Now · 发布 — · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Paragraphs 100-103: arbitrary detention finding and requested remedies.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2022-03-30 · 原后续记录 · 仅建议，未证实实施建议撤销判刑、消除犯罪记录、给予赔偿及其他补救；要求国家和提交方报告实施情况。

· 事件日期精度: day

具体程序与当事人：WGAD Opinion No.2/2022第101–108段的补救和跟进 · Alnur Ilyashev

实际参与者：UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention

来源记载的后续结果：这些是WGAD请求的补救。现有已读资料未确认撤销、消除记录或赔偿实际完成。

仅保留行动与结果的时间先后，不认定因果。

  • 国内执行措施、赔偿金额和记录消除结果均未知；不可推断已成功。
Opinion No. 2/2022 concerning Alnur Ilyashev (Kazakhstan), A/HRC/WGAD/2022/2

UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention · 发布 2022-05-13 · PDF第1页第2段；第16页第100–108段；第17页通过日期2022-03-30。官方PDF经普通curl下载及pypdf读取；web入口报错。

quash Mr. Ilyashev’s sentence, expunge his criminal record
legacy_recorded · full_text · agent_checked · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2022-09-13 · 历史行动 · 已实施（不是成功标签）向国务顾问Erlan Karin发出联合函，逐项询问撤销判刑、消除记录、赔偿、调查及法律改革进度，并促请接受WGAD访问请求。

本案 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：执行WGAD Opinion No.2/2022的后续倡议 · Alnur Ilyashev

实际参与者：Freedom Now / Clooney Foundation for Justice / TrialWatch

来源记载的后续结果：函件与署名可读。CFJ当日称尚无补救进度告知；此为该时点参与者观察，不能推断以后一直无执行。

仅保留行动与结果的时间先后，不认定因果。

  • 联合函后是否收到答复未知。
  • 2021-02-12由Freedom Now与McKool Smith提交WGAD申请是报告前行动，仅用于来源背景，不计报告后新提交。
  • 函件后答复、国内执行、记录消除及实际付款未确认。
Letter to State Counselor Erlan Karin re UN WGAD Opinion No. 2/2022 concerning Alnur Ilyashev

Freedom Now and Clooney Foundation for Justice / TrialWatch · 发布 2022-09-13 · PDF第1页收发主体/日期；第2–3页Information Requested五项问题；第4页签署人

We write to inquire about the progress of the Government
legacy_recorded · full_text · agent_checked · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Kazakhstan Should Comply with UN Decision and Quash Activist’s Conviction

Clooney Foundation for Justice · 发布 2022-09-13 · 正文第3–5段与Background首段：联合函、参与分工、2021年WGAD申请日期

Today, Freedom Now and the Clooney Foundation for Justice issued a letter
legacy_recorded · full_text · agent_checked · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Letter to State Counselor Erlan Karin re WGAD Opinion No. 2/2022

Freedom Now and Clooney Foundation for Justice / TrialWatch · 发布 2022-09-13 · PDF p.1 date/senders; pp.2–3 Information Requested; p.4 signatures; p.2 visually checked

Has the sentence imposed on Mr. Ilyashev in June 2020 been quashed?
source_checked · full_text · agent_checked · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Kazakhstan Should Comply with UN Decision and Quash Activist’s Conviction

Clooney Foundation for Justice · 发布 2022-09-13 · Opening paragraph on joint letter issued 2022-09-13; Background opening paragraph on petition actually filed 2021-02-12

issued a letter […] filed a petition with the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
source_checked · full_text · agent_checked · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2023-04-17 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 后来观察到的结果 · 已实施（不是成功标签）上传研究报告记载：Freedom Now reports release from house arrest.

本案 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Alnur Ilyashev — original monitored proceeding · Alnur Ilyashev

实际参与者：

来源记载的后续结果：仅作研究记录；此行未独立证明后续救济、执行或成功。

行动与结果的关系未知。

  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
Kazakhstan v. Alnur Ilyashev — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-02-row-04

Freedom Now reports release from house arrest.
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Alnur Ilyashev

Freedom Now · 发布 — · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Explicit report of release from house arrest on 17 April 2023.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2023-07-31 · 原后续记录 · 已实施（不是成功标签）WGAD年报公布政府后续立场，并记载政府于2022-06-08迟延答复。

· 事件日期精度: day

具体程序与当事人：WGAD年度报告A/HRC/54/51中Opinion No.2/2022后续 · Alnur Ilyashev

实际参与者：UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention / 哈萨克斯坦政府（被转述反馈方）

来源记载的后续结果：表格引述政府称未发现刑诉侵权、未向法院申请赔偿等；这不是WGAD撤回原意见或CaseLink确认没有侵权。年报没有确认给予补救。

仅保留行动与结果的时间先后，不认定因果。

  • 政府“未上诉”说法与原报告上诉记录表面不一致，可能针对不同程序；未取得回复全文，不能覆盖历史事实。
Arbitrary detention: Report of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, A/HRC/54/51

UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention · 发布 2023-07-31 · PDF第6页表格2/2022行及脚注7。该行后续栏明确归属Information from the Government。

On 8 June 2022, the Government submitted a late response, after the adoption of the opinion.
legacy_recorded · full_text · agent_checked · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2025 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 历史行动 · 已实施（不是成功标签）在2025年6–7月国家审议提交中，报告另一份人权事务委员会个人来文已提交、仍待登记。

本案 · 事件日期精度: year · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Alnur Ilyashev v. Kazakhstan个人来文；与WGAD程序分开 · Alnur Ilyashev

实际参与者：TrialWatch / Clooney Foundation for Justice及合作方（该脚注未逐一列名）

来源记载的后续结果：待登记仅为提交方当时记录；未确认受理、实体审理或补救。本记录不将WGAD意见当人权事务委员会意见。

仅保留行动与结果的时间先后，不认定因果。

  • 个人来文确切提交日、登记号及后续状态未知。
  • 不同国际机制程序资格与重复审理限制需单独研究，不从历史案例推出新案可同样提交。
  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
TrialWatch Submission to the UN Human Rights Committee, 144th Session, June–July 2025: Review of Kazakhstan

TrialWatch（OHCHR网站收录的NGO提交，非委员会决定） · 发布 — · PDF第1页脚注4；标题为2025年6–7月第144届会期，未载确切提交日期

Alnur Ilyashev v. Kazakhstan (awaiting registration)
legacy_recorded · full_text · agent_checked · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Kazakhstan v. Alnur Ilyashev — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-02-row-06

2025 HRC submission: Ilyashev communication awaiting registration.
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
TrialWatch Submission to the UN Human Rights Committee: 144th Session, June-July 2025, Review of Kazakhstan

Clooney Foundation for Justice / TrialWatch; hosted by OHCHR · 发布 — · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Page 1, footnote 4: submitted HRC communication awaiting registration.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2025-04-30 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 报道发布 · 已实施（不是成功标签）上传研究报告记载：Vlast published an interview describing continuing conviction-related professional obstacles.

本案 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Alnur Ilyashev — original monitored proceeding · Alnur Ilyashev

实际参与者：

来源记载的后续结果：仅作研究记录；此行未独立证明后续救济、执行或成功。

行动与结果的关系未知。

  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
Kazakhstan v. Alnur Ilyashev — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-02-row-05

Vlast published an interview describing continuing conviction-related professional obstacles.
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Excluded from everywhere (Vycherknut otovsyudu)

Vlast · 发布 2025-04-30 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：Consultancy resumed; conviction prevented joining legal-consultants chamber; activity ban described as due to expire during 2025.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
2026-09-04 · 研究报告记载 / 待核底层来源 · 风险或人物情况 · 执行状态未知上传研究报告记载：Search and questioning in separate fraud investigation; subsequently released, according to September reporting and October monitoring.

同人另案，非原案结案 · 事件日期精度: day · 研究截止（非状态确认日）: 2026-10-09

具体程序与当事人：Alnur: 2026 Article 190 fraud investigation · Alnur Ilyashev

实际参与者：

来源记载的后续结果：仅作研究记录；此行未独立证明后续救济、执行或成功。2026另案证人/辩护权身份；并非原Article 274案重新定罪。

行动与结果的关系未知。

  • 底层来源尚未逐项打开；研究作者verified不得解释为团队核实。
  • 2026另案证人/辩护权身份；并非原Article 274案重新定罪。
Kazakhstan v. Alnur Ilyashev — uploaded independent follow-up

用户提供的独立研究作者（非TrialWatch官方报告） · 发布 2026-10-09 · PDF页 4；KEY PROCEDURAL DATES；followup-report-02-row-07

Search and questioning in separate fraud investigation; subsequently released, according to September reporting and October monitoring.
research_reported · full_text · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Complete purge, complete control: the wave of prosecutions of activists and journalists in Kazakhstan

Azattyq Asia / RFE/RL · 发布 2026-09-18 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：4 September search and questioning; release with undertaking to appear; witness-with-right-to-defence status in fraud investigation.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
Freedom of Speech in Kazakhstan: September 2026

Adil Soz International Foundation for Protection of Freedom of Speech · 发布 2026-10-08 · 上传研究清单所引定位（底层原文本轮未核对）：September 4 entry corroborates return home after questioning in Article 190 investigation; attributes witness status to information available to the newsroom.

research_reported · search_only · unreviewed · 核查 2026-10-09 · 团队人工审核未完成
追踪缺口与检索范围
  • 未取得国内撤销定罪、赔偿或消除记录的执行证明；本次未找到不等于没有后续。
  • 2025年个人来文之后状态仍待确认。
  • 研究截止并非当前司法状态确认日；PDF和JSON是同一研究成果。
  • Was the original conviction quashed or criminal record expunged following WGAD Opinion No. 2/2022?
  • Were compensation or other reparations implemented?
  • Was the five-year activity ban formally terminated, and were professional-registration restrictions removed?
  • What is the registration number and subsequent status of the separate Human Rights Committee communication?
  • Did the September 2026 fraud investigation alter Ilyashev's witness status or impose any later restrictions?

已读联合国A/HRC/WGAD/2022/2官方PDF（浏览器获取失败，普通curl读取成功）；Freedom Now同文副本供交叉检查。；已读2022-09-13联合函及CFJ参与者说明，2023年WGAD年报第6页及2025年TrialWatch国家审议提交。；检索Alnur Ilyashev + compensation / appeal / Working Group / Human Rights Committee / 2022–2026，含CFJ、Freedom Now、OHCHR与UN Library。；排除2026年针对公投命令的不同诉讼；排除2025年其他人WGAD意见中的历史引注。；本轮逐份读取上传PDF与manifest；未把研究作者的检索/verified作为团队核查。

01 / 事件脉络

案件时间线

2020-06-22判决后尚未或没有上诉

法院判处限制行动和政治、公民活动禁令。

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “At closing, the prosecution requested that Ilyashev be sentenced to three years in prison and be banned from political and civic activism for five years.53 On June 22, Judge Makharadze sentenced Ilyashev to three years of restricted movement, including regular check-ins with a probation officer, and a five-year ban on political and civic activism.54 Ilyashev appealed his conviction.”

    区分检方要求监禁与实际限制行动判决，并记录提出上诉。

    PDF 第 12 页 · 印刷页 11原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
02 / 行动记录

谁做了什么，后来发生了什么

01
已实施历史行动程序内法律行动

审前多次要求释放，报告记载均被拒绝。

Alnur Ilyashev 一方已起诉、传唤或候审日期未单列
材料记载的后续结果

材料未记录可与这项行动直接对应的结果。

行动与后续结果的联系未知。

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “Consistent with the UN Human Rights Committee’s finding that courts must undertake periodic re-evaluation of whether detention remains necessary,72 Ilyashev made several requests for release prior to trial. All were denied by the Medeu court.”

    正文明确审前多次释放请求均被拒；并非成功保释案例。

    PDF 第 16 页 · 印刷页 15原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
02
已实施历史行动程序内法律行动

主张最初两个月拘押期已满，要求释放并提出保释。

辩护律师审判中2020-06-18
材料记载的后续结果

Alnur Ilyashev 于2020年6月18日庭审中提出的释放及保释请求被法院拒绝。

报告明确联系该行动与所列回应；不外推为最终效果。

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “At the June 18 hearing, the defense noted that the two-month detention period initially approved by the court had expired, arguing that Ilyashev should be released and offering to post bail.78 In denying the request, the court stated that the maximum possible time for pretrial detention was six months, and thus Ilyashev could remain in pretrial detention for that entire period.79”

    辩方在庭审中以最初拘押期已满要求释放并提出保释，法院拒绝。

    PDF 第 17 页 · 印刷页 16原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
03
已实施历史行动程序内法律行动

对定罪提出上诉，报告记载上诉法院维持原判，最高法院亦未准上诉。

Alnur Ilyashev 及辩方正在上诉日期未单列
材料记载的后续结果

阿拉木图市法院于2020年9月15日全面维持对 Alnur Ilyashev 的一审判决。

哈萨克斯坦最高法院未准 Alnur Ilyashev 的上诉；报告未给出该决定的具体日期。

报告明确联系该行动与所列回应；不外推为最终效果。

原文
出处

2 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “At closing, the prosecution requested that Ilyashev be sentenced to three years in prison and be banned from political and civic activism for five years.53 On June 22, Judge Makharadze sentenced Ilyashev to three years of restricted movement, including regular check-ins with a probation officer, and a five-year ban on political and civic activism.54 Ilyashev appealed his conviction.”

    区分检方要求监禁与实际限制行动判决，并记录提出上诉。

    PDF 第 12 页 · 印刷页 11原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
  2. 02Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “Although the Almaty City Court – the appellate court – allowed the presentation of further evidence, on September 15 it upheld the lower court’s decision in full.55 The Kazakh Supreme Court recently denied Ilyashev’s appeal, finding that the court of first instance had sufficiently examined all relevant evidence. The defense has petitioned Kazakhstan’s Attorney General to “file a protest” with the Supreme Court requesting reconsideration of this decision.”

    上诉法院维持原判、最高法院未准上诉与请求总检察长抗诉是三个不同步骤；最后一项结果未载明。

    PDF 第 12 页 · 印刷页 11原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
04
已实施历史行动程序内法律行动

请求总检察长向最高法院提出抗诉，要求重新审查。

辩护方判决后尚未或没有上诉日期未单列
材料记载的后续结果

Alnur Ilyashev 的辩方已请求总检察长向最高法院提出抗诉，但2021年3月报告未记录该请求结果。

行动与后续结果的联系未知。

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “Although the Almaty City Court – the appellate court – allowed the presentation of further evidence, on September 15 it upheld the lower court’s decision in full.55 The Kazakh Supreme Court recently denied Ilyashev’s appeal, finding that the court of first instance had sufficiently examined all relevant evidence. The defense has petitioned Kazakhstan’s Attorney General to “file a protest” with the Supreme Court requesting reconsideration of this decision.”

    上诉法院维持原判、最高法院未准上诉与请求总检察长抗诉是三个不同步骤；最后一项结果未载明。

    PDF 第 12 页 · 印刷页 11原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
03 / 结果边界

已知结果与信息缺口

具体结果

Alnur Ilyashev 于2020年6月18日庭审中提出的释放及保释请求被法院拒绝。

事实截至 2021-03

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “At the June 18 hearing, the defense noted that the two-month detention period initially approved by the court had expired, arguing that Ilyashev should be released and offering to post bail.78 In denying the request, the court stated that the maximum possible time for pretrial detention was six months, and thus Ilyashev could remain in pretrial detention for that entire period.79”

    辩方在庭审中以最初拘押期已满要求释放并提出保释，法院拒绝。

    PDF 第 17 页 · 印刷页 16原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
具体结果

Alnur Ilyashev 于2020年6月22日被判三年限制行动及五年政治、公民活动禁令，实际判决不是检方所要求的三年监禁。

事实截至 2021-03

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “At closing, the prosecution requested that Ilyashev be sentenced to three years in prison and be banned from political and civic activism for five years.53 On June 22, Judge Makharadze sentenced Ilyashev to three years of restricted movement, including regular check-ins with a probation officer, and a five-year ban on political and civic activism.54 Ilyashev appealed his conviction.”

    区分检方要求监禁与实际限制行动判决，并记录提出上诉。

    PDF 第 12 页 · 印刷页 11原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
具体结果

阿拉木图市法院于2020年9月15日全面维持对 Alnur Ilyashev 的一审判决。

事实截至 2021-03

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “Although the Almaty City Court – the appellate court – allowed the presentation of further evidence, on September 15 it upheld the lower court’s decision in full.55 The Kazakh Supreme Court recently denied Ilyashev’s appeal, finding that the court of first instance had sufficiently examined all relevant evidence. The defense has petitioned Kazakhstan’s Attorney General to “file a protest” with the Supreme Court requesting reconsideration of this decision.”

    上诉法院维持原判、最高法院未准上诉与请求总检察长抗诉是三个不同步骤；最后一项结果未载明。

    PDF 第 12 页 · 印刷页 11原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
具体结果

哈萨克斯坦最高法院未准 Alnur Ilyashev 的上诉；报告未给出该决定的具体日期。

事实截至 2021-03

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “Although the Almaty City Court – the appellate court – allowed the presentation of further evidence, on September 15 it upheld the lower court’s decision in full.55 The Kazakh Supreme Court recently denied Ilyashev’s appeal, finding that the court of first instance had sufficiently examined all relevant evidence. The defense has petitioned Kazakhstan’s Attorney General to “file a protest” with the Supreme Court requesting reconsideration of this decision.”

    上诉法院维持原判、最高法院未准上诉与请求总检察长抗诉是三个不同步骤；最后一项结果未载明。

    PDF 第 12 页 · 印刷页 11原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
未记载

Alnur Ilyashev 的辩方已请求总检察长向最高法院提出抗诉，但2021年3月报告未记录该请求结果。

事实截至 2021-03

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “Although the Almaty City Court – the appellate court – allowed the presentation of further evidence, on September 15 it upheld the lower court’s decision in full.55 The Kazakh Supreme Court recently denied Ilyashev’s appeal, finding that the court of first instance had sufficiently examined all relevant evidence. The defense has petitioned Kazakhstan’s Attorney General to “file a protest” with the Supreme Court requesting reconsideration of this decision.”

    上诉法院维持原判、最高法院未准上诉与请求总检察长抗诉是三个不同步骤；最后一项结果未载明。

    PDF 第 12 页 · 印刷页 11原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页

材料未提供

  • 最高法院决定日期与总检察长抗诉请求结果未载明；未核查2021年3月之后进展。
  • 报告对公平审判和表达自由的评价属于作者分析；脚注的裁判、专家意见和观察笔记未独立核查。
  • 证据核验仅指与所供报告对照；不等于独立核实基础事件，也不表示报告日期后的当前状态。
04 / 尚未等同于行动

报告作者建议

以下是报告提出的主张，不能据此认定已实施或已产生结果。

材料仅建议

运用司法审查权纠正权利违反，并推翻维持定罪的上诉裁定。

建议涉及：哈萨克斯坦最高法院（专家建议对象）

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “First, the Kazakh Supreme Court should use its power of judicial review and remedy the violations of Ilyashev’s right to a fair trial and right to freedom of expression detailed above. Specifically, the Court should overturn the appellate decision upholding Ilyashev’s conviction.”

    专家呼吁最高法院纠正权利违反并推翻维持原判的上诉裁定；未把建议当已撤销定罪。

    PDF 第 44 页 · 印刷页 43原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页
材料仅建议

为远程听证保障被告同意、可用救济、实时保密律师沟通与稳定连线。

建议涉及：审判机关与相关主管机构（作者建议对象）

原文
出处

1 条英文原文摘录 · 附中文解释与 PDF 页码

  1. 01Alnur Ilyashev已记录原文摘录
    “Third, video conferencing guidelines recently issued by the European Criminal Bar Association are instructive:226 among other things, the use of videoconferencing should require the consent of the accused; legal remedies should be readily available to challenge a decision on using videoconferencing; an accused’s right to speak confidentially with his or her defense team must be guaranteed at all times (before and during hearings); an uninterrupted and high-quality connection must be in place; accused persons must be provided a full view of the courtroom, and be able to observe all participants; and any technical arrangements should ensure that the virtual hearing resembles an in-person hearing to the greatest extent possible.”

    作者提出远程审判的保密沟通和连线等保障建议；不表示这些保障在本案全部落实。

    PDF 第 44 页 · 印刷页 43原报告直接记载报告日期 2021-03 · 核查 2026-10-08Vânia Costa Ramos; American Bar Association Center for Human Rights / TrialWatch
    打开官方 PDF 对应页